how to upload a file of your ID?

It is very of import that you read through the following options and questions, and provide all required information truthfully and carefully.

This is a free work.
I can demonstrate that it is legally okay for anybody to use, in Wikipedia and elsewhere, for whatever purpose.

Cheers for offering to upload a costless work.

Wikipedia loves complimentary files. However, nosotros would love it fifty-fifty more if you uploaded them on our sister project, the Wikimedia Commons. Files uploaded on Commons can be used immediately here on Wikipedia every bit well as on all its sister projects. Uploading files on Eatables works just the same as hither. Your Wikipedia account will automatically work on Eatables besides.

Please consider uploading your file on Eatables.

All the same, if you adopt to do it here instead, you may become ahead with this form. You can as well first use this grade to collect the data virtually your file and then ship it to Commons from here.

Copyright status:
	This file is entirely my ain piece of work. I am the copyright holder. I made this myself, from scratch, without copying or incorporating anybody else's creative work, and I am willing to release it under a free license. Please note that by "entirely cocky-made" we actually mean just that. Practice non use this section for any of the following: a browse or photograph you fabricated of a painting, cartoon, printed page or other item originally created by somebody else. The copyright belongs to the original creator, not to you. a screenshot or other kind of capture of a video, computer screen, Telly programme or other kind of visual media. a picture you created by modifying or copying some other picture or by combining several preexisting pictures made by somebody else. a picture given to you lot by somebody else. a picture show you lot constitute somewhere on the Internet. Editors who falsely declare such items as their "own piece of work" will be blocked from editing. Please depict how and when yous created this particular. How? (due east.1000.: Where and on what kind of occasion did yous accept this photo? How did you make this diagram? etc.) Date (please use YYYY-MM-DD format if possible). Publication: Please indicate hither if you have previously published this item elsewhere, e.one thousand. on your ain website, your Flickr or Facebook account, etc., providing a link. Information technology is important that you place this piece of work under a complimentary license, which will permit everybody else to use it for whatsoever purpose, including both commercial and not-commercial purposes, and to change information technology. This license will be irrevocable.
	This file was given to me by its owner. The copyright owner of this file has given information technology to me for uploading on Wikipedia. I tin provide show that they have agreed to release it under a free license, for free utilise by anybody and for whatsoever purpose. Please describe who owns this work and how you got information technology from them. Owner/writer: Date of creation: Source: Where did yous get the file from? (e.yard. available online; was sent to me personally …) Permission: How did yous receive the permission? (e.g.: by email, personally, I work for the owner …) The copyright owner has called the following license: License: Other: Evidence: The license statement can be found online at: The license agreement has been forwarded to Wikimedia's volunteer response team at "permissions-en@wikimedia.org". OTRS ticket received: The license hasn't yet been forwarded, simply I volition do and so presently or enquire the owner to send information technology. I haven't got the evidence right at present, but I will provide some if requested to do and then. Note: files without verifiable permissions may be deleted. You may be better off obtaining proof of permission showtime.
	This file is from a costless published source. I took it from a website or other published source, where its author has explicitly placed it under a free license, allowing costless re-use by everyone. Use this only if there is an explicit licensing statement in the source. The website must explicitly say that the epitome is released nether a license that allows gratis re-employ for any purpose, east.grand. the Artistic Commons Attribution license. You lot must be able to point exactly to where it says this. If the source website doesn't say and then explicitly, please do not upload the file. Writer/owner: Appointment of creation: Source: For web sources: delight provide a link to the html web page where the file can be plant ("http://... .html"), not a direct link to the prototype file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For impress sources: provide full bibliographic information (author, championship, publisher, year, page, etc.) The copyright owner has called the following license for this file: License: Other: Evidence: Provide a link to where the author explicitly says that the file is released nether a free license. (if not visible on the source page itself).
	This work is so old its copyright has expired This is an onetime photograph, or a photographic reproduction of an old painting, drawing, etc. I tin can provide plenty data about its writer and provenance to prove that it is old enough for its copyright to have expired. It is now legally in the Public Domain. Original author: Please name the original writer of this work. Lifetime: Specify date of decease, if applicative to public domain status. In many cases, we need to be certain the writer died before a certain twelvemonth, in many cases earlier 1926. Original publication: Provide as much information equally possible well-nigh the original fourth dimension and place of publication of this work. For print publications: provide full bibliographic information. Date of publication: Provide appointment of showtime publication, and appointment of cosmos if different. Immediate source: Land exactly where you found this file. For web sources: delight provide a link to the html web page where the file can exist establish ("http://... .html"), not a directly link to the image file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For impress sources: provide full bibliographic information (author, championship, publisher, year, page, etc.) Public Domain status: This work is gratis of all copyrights considering: It was created and starting time published before 1926 and is therefore in the Public Domain in the United states of america. It was offset published outside the Us, and it was in the Public Domain in its state of origin by the "URAA date". For well-nigh countries, this ways the author died 70 years earlier 1 January 1996, i.e. before 1926. Please look up the copyright rules for the specific land at [1]. It was first published in the US earlier 1989, and its copyright expired considering it was published without a copyright find and/or without the necessary copyright registration. Delight look up the exact rules at [2]. Its copyright expired for some other reason. [Delight explain beneath]. Caption: Please provide any show necessary to verify the public domain status.
	This file is in the Public Domain for some other reason. I can demonstrate that this work is legally in the Public Domain, i.due east. nobody owns any copyrights on it. This may be for a variety of reasons, for instance considering it was created by the US Federal Government, or because it is also uncomplicated to concenter any copyright. Public Domain means that nobody owns any copyrights on this work. It does not mean simply that it is freely viewable somewhere on the web or that it has been widely used by others. This is not for images you simply found somewhere on the web. Near images on the web are under copyright and vest to somebody, even if you believe the owner won't care about that copyright. If information technology is in the public domain, y'all must be able to bespeak to an bodily constabulary that makes information technology then. If you can't point to such a law but merely found this paradigm somewhere, so please exercise not upload it. Author: Delight name the original author of this piece of work. Source: Country exactly where you found this file. For web sources: please provide a link to the html web page where the file can be found ("http://... .html"), not a straight link to the image file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For impress sources: provide total bibliographic data (author, championship, publisher, year, page, etc.) Date of creation: Public Domain status: This work is gratis of all copyrights because: It was created by an bureau of the US Federal Government. This does not apply to most Us state and local agencies, nor to governments of other countries! It is an official governmental particular, such as a flag, state keepsake, banknote or postage postage, from a country where such items are exempt from copyright according to local police. This does not employ to all countries, nor does information technology usually use to all publications! (For case, it unremarkably doesn't apply to simple publicity photographs published on a governmental website.) Please look upward the copyright rules for the specific state in question. If the country does non accept an exemption rule that applies to this item, keep with the section for "non-free copyrighted works" below. Explanation: Add any explanation or evidence necessary to substantiate your argument above. Cite and provide a link to the relevant law if possible. Information technology is too uncomplicated to be eligible for copyright. This typically applies only to graphics that consist solely of elementary geometric shapes and/or a few messages or words, or to items such as mathematical or chemical formulae. It may apply to some very simple logos that do not contain complex pictorial elements. It never applies to photographs! It is in the Public Domain for another reason. Explanation:

This is a copyrighted, non-costless piece of work, but I believe it is Fair Use.
I accept read the Wikipedia rules on Non-Free Content , and I am prepared to explain how the use of this file volition meet the criteria set out there.

Please call back that you lot will need to demonstrate that:

• The file will serve an important function in a particular article; (NFCC8)
• It cannot be replaced past whatever other, free illustration that might nonetheless be created; (NFCC1)
• Its use does not negatively affect the commercial interests of its owner (NFCC2)
• At that place will non be more non-costless material used than necessary. (NFCC3)

This file will be used in the following article:

Enter the proper name of exactly one Wikipedia article, without the [[...]] brackets and without the "http://en.wikipedia.org/..." URL code.
It has to be an bodily article, not a talkpage, template, user page, etc.
If you programme to utilise the file in more than 1 article, please proper name only one of them hither. Then, later on uploading, open the epitome description page for editing and add your separate explanations for each additional article manually.

Instance – article okay.

This article doesn't exist!

The commodity Example could not be constitute.

Please bank check the spelling, and make sure you enter the proper name of an existing article in which yous will include this file.

If this is an article y'all are simply planning to write, please write it first and upload the file later on.

This is non an actual encyclopedia commodity!

The folio Instance is not in the chief commodity namespace. Non-free files can only be used in mainspace article pages, not on a user page, talk page, template, etc.

Please upload this file only if it is going to be used in an bodily article.

If this page is an article draft in your user space, we're sorry, simply nosotros must ask you to await until the folio is prepare and has been moved into mainspace, and simply upload the file later that.

This is a disambiguation page!

The folio Example is not a existent article, but a disambiguation folio pointing to a number of other pages.

Delight check and enter the exact championship of the actual target commodity you meant.

Not-free utilize rationale
	This image is the object of discussion in an article. This is a copyrighted artwork or photograph, and the image itself is the topic of discussion in the article. The discussion is nigh the photograph or painting as such, as a artistic piece of work, not just about the matter or person it shows. Which of these options describes this detail all-time? Who created this work? Author/owner: Date: Source: State exactly where you found this file. For web sources: delight provide a link to the html web page where the file can be institute ("http://... .html"), not a direct link to the prototype file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For print sources: provide full bibliographic information (author, title, publisher, year, page, etc.) Usage: The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this item photograph/painting. (It is non just about the person or matter shown in the picture show.) In that location is a substantial amount of encyclopedic give-and-take of this particular photograph/painting (non just about the person or thing shown in it) in this article. The analogy is specifically needed to support the following point: If neither of these two statements applies, then delight do not upload this epitome. This department is non for images used merely to illustrate an commodity near a person or thing, showing what that person or thing expect similar.
	This is a delineation of a copyrighted 3-dimensional piece of work or building, which is the object of discussion in an article. This is a photograph or other kind of depiction of a copyrighted, iii-dimensional artistic work, such every bit a statue or work of architecture. The article contains a give-and-take of that work which requires illustration. The photograph equally such is free, or was provided by the creator of the sculpture. Which of these options describes this item best? Starting time describe who created the original work depicted: Creator: Date: Usage: The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to this piece of work. There is a substantial corporeality of encyclopedic give-and-take of this work in this commodity. The illustration is specifically needed to support the following point: Now describe who created the epitome: Author: Appointment: Source: Land exactly where yous found this file. For web sources: please provide a link to the html web folio where the file can be found ("http://... .html"), non a direct link to the prototype file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For print sources: provide full bibliographic information (author, championship, publisher, year, folio, etc.) Epitome status The prototype was created and published past the same author who also holds the rights to the original object, and no alternative depiction could exist suitably created. The author of the image has released the photographic work nether a free license, or information technology is in the public domain: Name the license or describe the public domain status, calculation whatever necessary evidence to brand the licensing status verifiable.
	This is an excerpt from a copyrighted work. This is an extract from a copyrighted work, e.g. a screenshot from a moving picture or TV programme, a panel from a comic, or a sound sample from a song. Its presence is needed to support a piece of explicit critical discussion in an article related to that work or its creator(s). Which of these options describes this detail all-time? Author: (writer / copyright owner of the original work) Date of creation: Source: (where exactly did you lot get this file from?) Please explain what exactly in the article it is that yous want to illustrate with this. Typically, the illustration must be used to support some specific consequence of word in the article. Delight be concrete and specific. Don't simply copy boilerplate statements from elsewhere. State clearly, in your own words, what this particular file will exist doing in this particular article. If necessary, please explicate why this purpose cannot exist achieved through text alone.
	This is the official cover fine art of a work. This is the encompass or dustjacket of a volume, the embrace of a CD or video, the official release poster of a movie, or a comparable detail. It volition be included as that work'southward master ways of visual identification, at the top of the article about the book, movie, etc. in question. Notation: If you plan to utilise it for any other purpose than this, delight tick the box for "other non-gratuitous work" beneath. Which of these options describes this item best? Author: (writer / copyright owner of the original work) Date of publication: Source: (where exactly did you get this file from?) This paradigm will be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the elevation of the commodity dedicated to the work in question. A standard fair use rationale will be added that matches this type of use. If yous program to utilise the file for whatever purpose other than this, please practice not use this section, but the ane labelled "other type of not-free piece of work" below.
	This is a logo of an organization, visitor, make, etc. This is an official logo of an entity that is the subject of a Wikipedia article. Information technology volition be included as that entity'southward primary means of visual identification, at the top of the article in question. Note: If you program to use it for whatsoever other purpose than this, please tick the box for "other non-costless work" below. Which of these options describes this item all-time? Source: (where exactly did you get this file from?) This image will exist shown as a primary ways of visual identification at the height of the commodity dedicated to the entity in question. A standard fair utilise rationale will exist added that matches this type of utilise. If you plan to employ the file for any purpose other than this, please do non apply this section, but the one labelled "other type of non-complimentary work" beneath.
	This is a historical portrait of a person no longer alive. This is a historical photo or other depiction of a person who is no longer live. It volition be used as the primary ways of visual identification of that person in the commodity well-nigh them. Deceased since: (This type of file tin typically only exist used with people who are no longer live.) Author: (Who made this image?) Original publication: (Where, when and how was this image first published?) Engagement of publication: Source: (Where exactly did yous get this file from?) This epitome will be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the summit of the article dedicated to the person in question. A standard fair employ rationale volition exist added that matches this type of utilize. If you plan to employ the file for any purpose other than this, please do not utilise this department, but the one labelled "other type of non-free piece of work" below. Please explain why a gratis culling to this image cannot be found. For subjects who died recently: have you lot made a reasonable effort to observe people who might possess photographs of this person and might be willing to release one? For subjects who lived in the early-to-mid 20th century: have you considered if there might be an older photograph that has fallen in the public domain? Please explain why y'all are confident that our employ of the file will not damage whatever commercial opportunities of its owner. We will typically non utilize a file if its owner has a potential commercial interest in its use, and if our use of it would compete with its original market part.
	This is some other kind of not-free work that I believe is legitimate Fair Use. This is a copyrighted work whose use does non fall into whatsoever of the classes above. I have read the Wikipedia rules on Non-costless content, and I will explain how this file meets all of the criteria set out at that place. Which of these options describes this detail best? Author: (Who made this paradigm?) Original publication: (Where, when and how was this prototype get-go published?) Engagement of publication: Source: (Where exactly did yous get this file from?) Please explain what exact purpose this file volition serve in the article. Please exist physical and specific. Don't but copy boilerplate statements from elsewhere. Country clearly, in your own words, what this particular file will be doing in this particular commodity. Your explanation must make information technology clear why the article would be significantly worse off without this file. Please explain why this purpose could not be served by text alone. Please explain why this purpose could non exist served with an alternative, free illustration that could yet be establish or created. For a file to be deemed replaceable, information technology is non necessary that a suitable replacement already exists. Even if it is merely possible that a replacement could be created, nosotros will not use the non-free file. Delight explain why yous are confident that our employ of the file will non harm any commercial opportunities of its possessor. We volition typically not use a file if its owner has a potential commercial interest in its use, and if our use of it would compete with its original market part. Retrieve that the use of not-free files must be minimal. This tin mean several things: Don't use more files per commodity/topic than necessary Don't use the same file in more articles than necessary Don't use larger excerpts of a unmarried work than necessary Don't use images of higher resolution than necessary In view of this, delight explain how the use of this file will be minimal. Special source and license conditions (optional) Whatever further relevant information about this file? Edit summary: A brief description of why you are overwriting this file. This will not be saved on the clarification folio, but will be shown in its edit history. Yes, I want this file to exist immediately available in all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. I volition upload information technology on the Wikimedia Commons. Clicking this button will redirect y'all to a page on Commons. This will only piece of work if you are already logged in there, which is probable the case if you lot have a unified account. Check here to see if you are logged in. No, I want to upload this file locally. This manner information technology tin can exist used only on the English Wikipedia. We urge y'all to upload it to the Commons unless in that location is a very good reason for it to stay local. Frequently such local files are copied to the Commons for use elsewhere and deleted locally, requiring extra work for other volunteers. If yous do not desire your file to be copied to Eatables and deleted locally, consider adding the {{Continue local}} tag. Reset this grade and start over.

This file doesn't fit either of the categories in a higher place.
This file doesn't seem to fall into either of the classes higher up, or I am not sure what its condition is. I constitute this file somewhere, but I don't really know who fabricated it or who owns it.

Well, we're very sorry, only if y'all're non certain about this file'due south copyright status, or if it doesn't fit into any of the groups to a higher place, so:

Please don't upload information technology.

Actually, please don't. Even if you call back it would make for a great addition to an article. We really take these copyright rules very seriously on Wikipedia. Note that media is assumed to be fully-copyrighted unless shown otherwise; the burden is on the uploader.

In detail, please don't upload:

• any file you merely plant on some website, without knowing who its author or copyright possessor is.
• any file you lot found somewhere, even if you have good reason to believe information technology has a copyright owner who would not mind us using it, but you lot don't accept an explicit licensing statement from them.
• whatever file that was released for publicity purposes by its owners just doesn't accept a fully-free license for free re-use for all purposes.
• whatsoever file credited to a commercial image agency, such as Reuters, AP or Getty Images. Such files normally cannot be used fifty-fifty under the "Fair Employ" rules, except in rare cases.
• any file that is licensed for employ exclusively on Wikipedia, or is gratuitous except that the free license excludes commercial use.

If you are in any doubt, delight ask some experienced editors for advice before uploading. People will be happy to assist y'all at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you lot.

montenegrosualleadiang.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard